Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Notice to Readers: Change in MMWR Announcements
Effective January 12, 2018, Announcements will be limited to public health events (e.g., World AIDS Day or Great American Smokeout) that are topically related to Full Reports. Both the Announcement and Full Report will appear on the cover of the issue. Information about other national health observances is available at https://healthfinder.gov/NHO/default.aspx.
متن کاملScientific Misconduct.
Scientific misconduct has been defined as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Scientific misconduct has occurred throughout the history of science. The US government began to take systematic interest in such misconduct in the 1980s. Since then, a number of studies have examined how frequently individual scientists have observed scientific misconduct or were involved in it. Although the ...
متن کاملNotice to Readers: Special Podcast: “Defining Moments in MMWR History — E. coli O157:H7”
MMWR has released a special podcast that highlights the leading role that MMWR played in reporting on the deadly multistate Escherichia coli O157:H7 foodborne outbreak of 1993. "Defining Moments in MMWR History - E. coli O157:H7" features an interview with Dr. Beth Bell conducted by MMWR Editor-in-Chief Dr. Sonja Rasmussen. Dr. Bell, who served as director of the National Center for Emerging an...
متن کاملMisconduct by researchers and authors.
Most scientific research is conducted properly and reported honestly but a few authors invent or manipulate data to reach fraudulent conclusions. Other types of misconduct include deliberately providing incomplete or improperly processed data, failure to follow ethical procedures, failure to obtain informed consent, breach of patient confidentiality, improper award or denial of authorship, fail...
متن کاملCoping with scientific misconduct.
author (which had been accepted but not yet published) that also seemed to be plagiarised. However, the author’s hospital did not respond. In another of the four cases (09-11), an editor had concerns about the ethics of a trial of a homoeopathic treatment for HIV/AIDS. The editor was concerned that patients may have been denied effective antiretroviral treatment and wanted clarification about h...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0832-610X,1496-8975
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9087-9